Cultural Dimensions in Corporate Relationships - Satu Teerikangas - June 3, 2003, 1:20 p.m.
Symposium: "A New Base for Corporate Relations: From Strategic Deceit to Trustworthy Action", Nokia House, Espoo Finland, Tuesday, June 3, 2003.
This digest was created in real-time during the meeting, based on the speaker's presentation(s) and comments from the audience. These should not be viewed as official transcripts of the meeting, but only as an interpretation by a single individual. Lapses, grammatical errors, and typing mistakes may not have been corrected. Questions about content should be directed to the originator. These notes have been contributed by David Ing (daviding@systemicbusiness.org) at the IBM Advanced Business Institute ( http://www.ibm.com/abi ).
[Satu Teerikangas]
Cultural view
We often speak of national cultures, but now entering a different world.
We living in a world where mixing cultures are a part of everyday life
Amount of international context
Historically, people within 20km
Industrial revolution
Now talk around globe
Has man been able to adapt itself to the changing conditions?
What is culture?
Difficult because there are so many definitions and
views
Which? Corporate, industry, departments, social class,
gender differences
What view as a researcher? Cross-cultural
psychologist, anthropologist, …
Different concepts related: identity, race,
nationalism, diversity, values - hard to draw the line
How should I see it?
Cultures don't exist, because they're constructed,
.. or
Yes, they do exist … or
Culture explains everything
All views are biased towards different directions
Some framing for culture:
Culture as a collective programming
Culture not as independent persons
Depends on environment
Culture as world views
Not bad or good, e.g. Finland summer cottages,
living as a third world country -- simple life as poor.
Nokia world view as different from IBM world view
Hofstede 1991: Linkage of personality, culture and human nature
Pyramid:
Human nature: hunger, emotion, ..
Culture: conditions human nature
Personality: specific to individual, but sometime overrides culture
Instead of just understanding culture, want to depict different types of culture.
Most research looks at national culture, few as
cross-culture.
National culture ,e.g. China
Regional: Beijing vs. Guangdong
Social culture
Professional: engineering
…
Other view: an iceberg model to represent culture
Things that you see, and those you don't see.
Visible: artifacts, practices and behaviours
Invisible: values, norms, beliefs, accepted
assumptions about our existence.
Visible are just cues into the hidden part of culture.
May be able to change most visible corporate cultures, but have to live with national cultures
May find 200 different assumptions
Three categories
Relationships about the environment
Relationship with other people
Communications
Study on Finns, Chinese and Japanese
In corporate relationships, can see icebergs that collide into each other
e.g. it's usually R&D people who usually operate globally; production people are local.
Research mixed on prolonged stay and contact on a new culture: culture shock curve, Furnham 1986
Honeymoon
Culture shock
Acculturation
Breaking through
Some content on this website may be subject to prior copyrights.
Please contact the author(s) prior to reproduction or further distribution of the materials.