Themes for Day Two -- David Hawk -- June 4, 2003, 9 a.m.
Symposium: "A New Base for Corporate Relations: From Strategic Deceit to Trustworthy Action", Nokia House, Espoo Finland, Tuesday, June 3, 2003.
This digest was created in real-time during the meeting, based on the speaker's presentation(s) and comments from the audience. These should not be viewed as official transcripts of the meeting, but only as an interpretation by a single individual. Lapses, grammatical errors, and typing mistakes may not have been corrected. Questions about content should be directed to the originator. These notes have been contributed by David Ing (daviding@systemicbusiness.org) at the IBM Advanced Business Institute ( http://www.ibm.com/abi ).
[David Hawk]
In addition to yesterday's topics, today …
Would like to add back, from the systems course: the non-rational
Are innovation-oriented relationships non-rational?
Symmetric / asymmetric
Dependence / independence / interdependence
Evaluative theme: evaluation of relationship
Increasingly reverting to "doing the right thing"
Not as ambiguous as people would like to argue.
Project for the U.S. government about 8 years.
Someone had read David's dissertation, which was about governance
If the problem is well-stated, they're easy
If they're hard, they're governance issues
Had argued that environmental programs would make things worse.
Dissertation was causing EPA to ban him
In the 1990s, EPA requested a self-organized, anarchic approach
Energy-Star: not paid to manufacturers
Used in building houses
No incentives, it's just a better product
No rules, except it had to pass the text
No protocol, except had to pass the test
Photograph: Efficiency is not effectiveness
Workers walking on AC ducts
Photograph: Technology overcomes trust
General Electric plastic house
GE was running this division
Agenda to create vinyl siding, because they didn't really want to build a plastic house.
They didn't do research; the suppliers did research.
GE laughed to the bank
Photograph: The potentials of deceit
No plastic in the house: just a wood frame house
Photograph: Strategic success
GE was successful, plastic
Photograph: Successfully doing the wrong thing
Now, plastic fences
Photograph: Winning the battle, losing the war via technical success
Nestehaus didn't recognize GE wasn't going to create a plastic house.
They built a 100% plastic house
You can't breath in it!
Photograph: Out in the cold with the truth
The Finns made a plstic house that GE never intended to
Photograph: Right relations are essential to doing the right thing
Merchal-Hoose, southern France, builder of Ikea furniture and building houses
High-tech, sophisticated research to make a traditional house
6 people build 4 houses per day, and no wood touches hands
Photograph: Effective efficiency:
Criterion: how to save wood
Silly, because Scandinavian is covered with wood
It's labour that is expensive.
Saving resources, using human labour to do it.
Same number of employees before automation as after automation, just doing something different.
Fully integrated firm: glass, furniture, cabinets, automation that makes the other things (because no one else will)
At the end of the day, if they brought in a sketch of the house in the morning, they could take it home at night.
Different way to shape the relationship agenda
The world of the non-rational:
Most of the time, in Ph.D. classes, we talk about rationality.
Go home at night, "please darling, be rationale".
About 10% of exaggerated reality is based on rationality
So what is the rest of the stuff? The non-rationale.
Those who depend on the rationale create the non-rational.
We should learn to embrace the non-rationale.
It would be more fun.
It would be more inclusive.
Marianne's presentation on portfolio: goes from rational to non-rational
Includes poetics, aesthetics, religion, politics
How to shift this discussion of relationships towards non-rational is a major effort
Doing the right thing - then not so hard to move into the non-rational
List of 17 terms:
Which concepts were important in the last decade, which are important to the present, and which are crucial to the next decade
Yesterday, nice discourse for the last hour
TEKES is special compared to others in the world
Combination of NSF and NIST, but more successful, in terms of limited resources giving incredible work in infrastructure: educated people
In 1994, presented to senators in Washington, in TEKES
Dutch are interested in TEKES; so are Austrians
Science depends on candor, openness and transparency
Some content on this website may be subject to prior copyrights.
Please contact the author(s) prior to reproduction or further distribution of the materials.